A person checking a wearable, calm and focused — human over gadget, experimental lab imagery
RABBIT HOLE / 06

BIOHACK
YOURSELF.

Measure it. Test it. Question it.

From wearables and supplements to sleep tech, biomarkers and self-experiments — we test the tools promising to make humans better. Curious about the science, sceptical of the hype, willing to run the experiment and willing to say when something did nothing.

GO DOWN THE RABBIT HOLE
NEW HERE?

START HERE.

Before you buy another wearable, supplement or red glowing device — start here. Not the latest — the most important.

THE BETTER HUMAN GUIDE TO BIOHACKING
FEATURED PILLAR15 MIN READ

THE BETTER HUMAN GUIDE TO BIOHACKING

What is actually worth measuring, testing and experimenting with — and what probably isn’t. The one piece we’d hand anyone before they buy another wearable, supplement or red glowing device.

READ THE GUIDE
WHAT SHOULD YOU ACTUALLY TRACK?
TRACKING

WHAT SHOULD YOU ACTUALLY TRACK?

8 MIN READ
THE BETTER HUMAN GUIDE TO WEARABLES
WEARABLES

THE BETTER HUMAN GUIDE TO WEARABLES

11 MIN READ
SUPPLEMENTS: WHAT’S ACTUALLY WORTH TAKING?
SUPPLEMENTS

SUPPLEMENTS: WHAT’S ACTUALLY WORTH TAKING?

10 MIN READ
HOW TO RUN AN N=1 EXPERIMENT
METHOD

HOW TO RUN AN N=1 EXPERIMENT

7 MIN READ
HEALTH DATA: USEFUL INFORMATION OR JUST MORE NOISE?
DATA

HEALTH DATA: USEFUL INFORMATION OR JUST MORE NOISE?

9 MIN READ
THE BEST BIOHACK MIGHT BE BORING
PERSPECTIVE

THE BEST BIOHACK MIGHT BE BORING

6 MIN READ
THE BIG STORY
Editorial documentary cover image
FEATURE / LONG READ · 17 MIN

ARE YOU OPTIMISING YOUR LIFE — OR JUST TRACKING IT?

We can now measure sleep, heart rate, glucose, stress, recovery and almost everything else. But does having more data actually make us better humans — or just more anxious ones?

READ THE STORY
WATCH

WE TEST THE WEIRD STUFF.

THE BETTER HUMAN GUIDE TO BIOHACKING
15:30

THE BETTER HUMAN GUIDE TO BIOHACKING

What’s worth measuring, what’s worth testing, and what’s mostly marketing dressed up as science.

Apple Watch vs WHOOP vs Oura: what do you actually need?
9 MIN

Apple Watch vs WHOOP vs Oura: what do you actually need?

30 days of cold showers: worth it?
7 MIN

30 days of cold showers: worth it?

Supplements: what do we actually take seriously?
8 MIN

Supplements: what do we actually take seriously?

EXPERIMENT / 7 DAYS
TRY THIS

THE 7-DAY BASELINE.

Before trying to optimise anything, spend seven days simply measuring your normal life. Track sleep, steps, resting heart rate, training, energy and mood. Do NOT deliberately change anything. At the end, ask what patterns you can actually see. The message: measure before you meddle.

RUN THE EXPERIMENT
  1. 01

    Track sleep, steps and resting heart rate for seven days.

  2. 02

    Log your training, energy and mood each evening.

  3. 03

    Do NOT deliberately change anything. Just observe.

  4. 04

    Weigh in only if relevant — once, at the same time.

  5. 05

    At day seven, look for the real patterns, not the spikes.

WE TRIED IT

30 DAYS WITHOUT TRUSTING OUR RECOVERY SCORE.

Editorial experiment image
EXPERIMENT · 30 DAYS
01

THE IDEA

Wearables give a single ‘readiness’ number each morning. We wanted to know how it actually compares to listening to the body.

02

THE PROTOCOL

Cover the score for 30 days. Train based on sleep quality, soreness, motivation and how the warm-up felt. Log everything.

03

WHAT WE MEASURED

Training performance, perceived effort, sleep, mood and how often we’d have overridden our own judgement using the score.

04

WHAT HAPPENED

We trained hard on several days the app would have told us to back off — and felt fine. We also backed off twice the score would have green-lit.

05

WHAT SURPRISED US

How often the score and the body disagreed. The body was a better guide to readiness than the number more often than expected.

06

WHAT DIDN’T MATTER

Knowing the score didn’t make the training better. It mostly made us second-guess decisions that were already obvious.

07

WOULD WE KEEP DOING IT?

Mostly yes. The wearable is useful for trends over weeks — not a daily permission slip to train or rest.

What happens when you stop letting a number on your wrist decide whether you train? We ignored the recovery score for a month and let sleep, soreness and feel guide the call instead.

SEE THE EXPERIMENT

Illustrative experiment journal — no body-transformation claims.

THE PEOPLE WHO KNOW THEIR STUFF

MEET THE HUMANS
WHO ACTUALLY
KNOW THIS STUFF.

MEET OUR EXPERTS
DR. JORDAN OKONKWO
Exercise Scientist

DR. JORDAN OKONKWO

“Correlation isn’t causation. A wearable spotting a pattern isn’t the same as understanding it.”

DR. RENA VOSS
Physician

DR. RENA VOSS

“Most people don’t need more data. They need someone to help them read the data they’ve already got.”

DR. NOOR ABEDI
Sleep Researcher

DR. NOOR ABEDI

“Your sleep tracker is an estimate, not a measurement. Treat the number as a rough guide, not a verdict.”

DR. MARCUS HALE
Longevity Researcher

DR. MARCUS HALE

“The supplements with the best evidence are also the cheapest. That’s not a coincidence you should ignore.”

Illustrative profiles — demonstration contributors. No fabricated qualifications or endorsements.

ON OUR RADAR

THE EDGE
MOVES FAST.

The emerging health-performance technology, tools and claims circulating right now. Interesting doesn’t mean proven — we keep them clearly labelled.

  • TESTING

    CONTINUOUS GLUCOSE MONITORING

    CGMs for non-diabetics are everywhere. Useful signal for some, expensive noise for many — the personalised response part is genuinely interesting.

  • WATCHING

    AI HEALTH COACHES

    LLMs reading your wearable data and handing you advice. Promising direction, currently very confident about very little.

  • DEBATED

    BIOLOGICAL AGE TESTING

    ‘Ageing clocks’ promise a single number. What they measure — and how repeatable they are — is still genuinely unsettled.

  • WATCHING

    SMART RINGS

    Rings are now a mainstream sleep and recovery tracker. Good trends, still no device that measures sleep perfectly.

  • EARLY

    NON-INVASIVE GLUCOSE MONITORING

    Reading glucose through the skin without a needle. The holy grail if it works; accuracy is the whole game.

  • CURIOUS

    PERSONALISED BLOOD TESTING

    At-home panels interpreted for your context rather than generic ranges. Interesting framing, quality varies wildly.

  • EARLY

    METABOLOMICS

    Reading the small molecules your body produces. A genuinely interesting frontier — and a long way from your wrist.

  • OVERHYPED?

    DIGITAL TWINS FOR HEALTH

    A virtual copy of you to test interventions on. Compelling idea, mostly speculative at the individual level today.

BETTER HUMAN ORIGINAL

THE BULLSHIT
METER.

Hype versus evidence. Cost versus effort. What’s claimed versus what the data actually supports. We cut through the noise so you don’t have to. Useful, slightly irreverent, anti-hype.

COLD EXPOSURE

READ
HYPE█████████░9/10
EVIDENCE██████░░░░6/10
COST██░░░░░░░░2/10
EFFORT██████░░░░6/10

VERDICT

Interesting tool.

Not magic.

Use carefully.

RED LIGHT THERAPY

READ
HYPE████████░░8/10
EVIDENCE████░░░░░░4/10
COST███████░░░7/10
EFFORT██░░░░░░░░2/10

VERDICT

Some real biology.

Mostly oversold.

Don’t expect much.

CREATINE

READ
HYPE█████░░░░░5/10
EVIDENCE██████████10/10
COST█░░░░░░░░░1/10
EFFORT█░░░░░░░░░1/10

VERDICT

Rare supplement that works.

Cheap, safe, effective.

Boringly good.

CGM (NON-DIABETIC)

READ
HYPE████████░░8/10
EVIDENCE█████░░░░░5/10
COST██████░░░░6/10
EFFORT████░░░░░░4/10

VERDICT

Interesting for some.

Noise for many.

Know why you’re wearing it.

Design prototype — scores are illustrative editorial judgements, not scientific ratings or medical advice. Evidence shifts; read the linked guides before deciding.

JUST PUBLISHED

LATEST FROM BIOHACK YOURSELF.

VIEW ALL BIOHACK CONTENT
The one sleep metric actually worth watching on your wearable
ARTICLE

The one sleep metric actually worth watching on your wearable

7 MINREAD
We tested three recovery wearables for a month. Here’s what they agreed on.
DEVICE TEST

We tested three recovery wearables for a month. Here’s what they agreed on.

9 MINREAD
What a CGM taught us about ‘spikes’ — and what didn’t matter
VIDEO

What a CGM taught us about ‘spikes’ — and what didn’t matter

8 MINREAD
30 days without trusting our recovery score. What actually happened.
EXPERIMENT

30 days without trusting our recovery score. What actually happened.

11 MINREAD
A plain-English guide to blood tests worth asking for
GUIDE

A plain-English guide to blood tests worth asking for

10 MINREAD
A new ‘biological age’ test claims to be repeatable. We’re sceptical.
RADAR

A new ‘biological age’ test claims to be repeatable. We’re sceptical.

5 MINREAD
READY TO TEST SOMETHING?

DON’T JUST READ ABOUT BIOHACKING. RUN THE EXPERIMENT.

Better Human members turn interesting ideas into structured experiments, Sprints, Challenges and Programs. Measure something. Test something. Learn something. Still you doing the work.

07

7-DAY BASELINE

Measure your normal life for a week before you try to optimise anything.

COMING SOON
14

14-DAY SLEEP EXPERIMENT

A structured two-week test of the sleep changes that actually move the needle.

COMING SOON
30

BETTER HUMAN DATA PROJECT

A month of honest measurement, one variable at a time.

COMING SOON
EXPLORE BETTER HUMAN MEMBERSHIP

Prototype programs shown for illustration. Membership does not guarantee specific results.